agents/openai.yaml
interface: display_name: "Request Refactor Plan" short_description: "Plan a safe incremental refactor"
mattpocock/skills · GitHub
사용자 인터뷰를 통해 작은 단위의 커밋으로 구성된 상세한 리팩토링 계획을 수립한 후, 이를 GitHub 이슈로 등록하세요. 사용자가 리팩토링을 계획하거나, 리팩토링 RFC를 작성하거나, 리팩토링을 안전한 단계별 작업으로 나누고자 할 때 이 방법을 활용하세요.
프로젝트 폴더에서 아래 명령어를 실행하고, 설치할 에이전트를 선택하세요.
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill request-refactor-plan설치 명령을 직접 실행해야 적용됩니다. 지원 에이전트와 필요한 권한·라이선스는 제작자의 안내를 확인하세요.
agents/openai.yamlinterface: display_name: "Request Refactor Plan" short_description: "Plan a safe incremental refactor"
SKILL.md--- name: request-refactor-plan description: Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps. --- This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary. 1. Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions. 2. Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase. 3. Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them. 4. Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough. 5. Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change. 6. Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are. 7. Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working." 8. Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description: <refactor-plan-template> ## Problem Statement The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective. ## Solution The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective. ## Commits A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state. ## Decision Document A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include: - The modules that will be built/modified - The interfaces of those modules that will be modified - Technical clarifications from the developer - Architectural decisions - Schema changes - API contracts - Specific interactions Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly. ## Testing Decisions A list of testing decisions that were made. Include: - A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details) - Which modules will be tested - Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase) ## Out of Scope A description of the things that are out of scope for this refactor. ## Further Notes (optional) Any further notes about the refactor. </refactor-plan-template>