agents/openai.yaml
interface: display_name: "21st UI Review" short_description: "Review UI against project design context" default_prompt: "Use st-ui-review to review this UI and safely fix deterministic issues."
21st-dev/skill · GitHub
Review existing UI against the project's design context, accessibility expectations, responsive behavior, interaction quality, and high-confidence production rules. Use for UI audits, design QA, frontend review, accessibility review, consistency checks, or requests to find and safely fix visual defects. Trigger for requests such as "review this UI", "audit this page", "find design issues", "check responsiveness", or "fix obvious UX problems". Use 21st-ui-build when the request is primarily to create new UI.
프로젝트 폴더에서 아래 명령어를 실행하고, 설치할 에이전트를 선택하세요.
npx skills add 21st-dev/skill --skill 21st-ui-review설치 명령을 직접 실행해야 적용됩니다. 지원 에이전트와 필요한 권한·라이선스는 제작자의 안내를 확인하세요.
agents/openai.yamlinterface: display_name: "21st UI Review" short_description: "Review UI against project design context" default_prompt: "Use st-ui-review to review this UI and safely fix deterministic issues."
SKILL.md--- name: 21st-ui-review description: Review existing UI against the project's design context, accessibility expectations, responsive behavior, interaction quality, and high-confidence production rules. Use for UI audits, design QA, frontend review, accessibility review, consistency checks, or requests to find and safely fix visual defects. Trigger for requests such as "review this UI", "audit this page", "find design issues", "check responsiveness", or "fix obvious UX problems". Use 21st-ui-build when the request is primarily to create new UI. --- # Review UI with evidence Separate deterministic defects from subjective design recommendations. ## Workflow 1. Read `.21st/design.json`, project instructions, and the relevant source. 2. Run the deterministic review first: ```bash 21st review <path> 21st review <path> --json ``` 3. Inspect the actual component composition and runtime states. Validate claims against code rather than inferring behavior from names. 4. Group findings into: - deterministic defects; - design-system drift; - accessibility and interaction defects; - responsive risks; - subjective product/design recommendations. 5. Prioritize by user impact and include exact file and line attribution. 6. Use `21st review <path> --fix` only for deterministic, low-ambiguity fixes. Never silently redesign, change brand identity, or alter product behavior. 7. Run relevant project tests after fixes and rerun review to prove resolution. ## Review priorities - semantic controls and accessible names; - keyboard access, focus visibility, and dialog/menu behavior; - image alternatives and meaningful labels; - touch target size and disabled/loading states; - responsive overflow and fixed-width assumptions; - reduced-motion handling; - hardcoded visual values that conflict with project tokens; - duplicate primitives instead of existing components; - inconsistent typography, radius, spacing, shadows, and icons; - fake data, placeholder copy, or missing empty/error states. ## Output Lead with actionable findings ordered by severity. Keep subjective suggestions clearly labeled. If no issue is proven, say so and state what was inspected.